What is a collaborator in a company?

Employee is a term that has been used by companies, especially since the 1990s, as a synonym for employee or employee. Unlike the employee, who performs a function, the word collaborator has a more participatory dimension  . Being a collaborator of a company is, therefore, being the one who really collaborates integrating the team and the work.

Human resources experts say that an employee cannot be just a piece of equipment. It should not be someone who concentrates only on performing the tasks for which they were hired, without having a more global awareness of the organization.

To be a collaborator, the employee must not only know the goals and objectives of the company, but also contribute to achieving them. That is to say,  instead of having the mission to fulfill its task, the employee must help the company to achieve its objective  .

However, for this to happen, it is not enough to use the term “employees” to replace “employees” or “employees”. Especially if the company doing this maintains an autocratic management process.

The company that wants to have employees needs to adopt a  motivation policy  . The motivation strategy in the corporate environment begins with the adoption of participatory management, in which employees have space to express their opinions and where there are channels to put these ideas into practice.

Another important point is the adoption of a  career plan  , which allows workers to see that their future is directly associated with the success of the company they work for.

Criticisms of the use of the term “collaborator”

Some scholars do not accept the use of the term “contributor” in place of words like “employee” or “employee.” The main criticism lies in the fact that the term can be used to hide the asymmetry in the employment relationship.

For these critics, for there to be a real collaboration, there must be a balance of forces, which does not happen in a relationship between the company and the worker. The use of “collaborator”, for them, is a way of camouflaging the tensions in labor relations.

The expression can lead workers to forget their presentation status, which does not cease to exist even when a company is more participatory. In some cases, according to critics. The term can be manipulated by companies to deny labor rights.